Regions are becoming increasingly grouped in Nineteen
Eighty-Four style, but we should be wary of the consequences and conscious of the
teachings detailed by George Orwell.
It's 1984, the world is divided between three superpowers
and war is ever-present. Control and
power are reserved for the elite who maintain their place by implementing
rigorous societal structures. Stepping out of place is a non-option, as history
is re-written and society is tyrannised by 'the Party' and its totalitarian
ideology.
Nineteen Eighty-Four is a novel which implicates many
aspects of life, some of which are becoming worryingly real. The
need to have war to keep social structure is something we should all be
familiar with today - ever since the Twin Towers collapsed the western world has
been led on a tireless campaign against a word ('terrorism') across the Middle
Eastern belt, replicating the 'them vs us' aspects seen in '84s Oceania.
And the list goes on; powerful structures (Apple, Microsoft
etc..) have gained monopolies and control by keeping tabs on everything we do -
a striking reference to the Telescreens seen in George Orwell's classic novel. A recent campaign by Google to document all
the books we own replicates aspects of Winston Smith's(protagonist) job as a
clerk in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth.
I could write a novel on the way in which society is
moulding into the perceptions made by Orwell, but I'm no sociologist, and so
I'll take a go at something I know a little about: business, economics, and
another Orwell trend that has been emerging of late: the rise of unified
superpowers.
"War is peace,
freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength." – 1984,
George Orwell
3 new superpowers
Eurozone/ Eurasia: Orwell's version of Eurasia isn’t
far from becoming reality. The merger of nation states (bar the UK) within
Europe with the Soviet Union is the one Orwell envisaged, and as we know, half
of that is already true. What's more, even though the notion has never been
ushered, Russia holds more allegiances with Europe than it does with Asia, and
there has been a flurry of cross-border activity of late which would only
benefit from an economic and monetary union (in theory).
Mercosur/ Oceana: Oceana is the biggest state in Orwell's 1984,
comprised much of Britain's former empire. Ireland, Iceland, Australia, New
Zealand, and southern Africa join Britain (Airstrip One), America and South
America, speaking English and divided into the ruling left, the ruling right
and the proles (practically meaningless ordinary people).
We know of Britain and America's special relationship, but
there is another bloc of unified states which will garner more interest as they
grow. The Mercosur union in Latin America has already bound the largest nations
on the continent under trade agreements, and there is talk that the
organisation's powers may be extended in a similar way to the eurozone. Things
are moving slow in South America, but the wheels are certainly in motion to
solidify the developing region.
CEPEA/ EastAsia: An emerging EastAsian bloc is
certainly the most comparable in terms of geography, with nations moving to
implement the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership for East Asia (CEPEA).
This is a Japanese led proposal for trade co-operation, but crucially, it
involves China, which means if steps can be made towards an agreement, this
will be a very powerful unification indeed.
The Cold War to the Great War
Superpowers struggle to coexist – the Cold War and tensions
between the US and China has highlighted this well over the last century. These
economic blocs are being created to allow nation states to compete on a global
level, but as they gain more momentum and influence we must be wary of how they
interact. Blocs don’t mean borders, and transparency through global agreements
(NATO, G7, G20 etc) will be crucial if we are to use 1984 as a warning, rather
than a template.
By Jack Peat
By Jack Peat
No comments:
Post a Comment